North Korea just threatened to nuke the White House. Here's why.

North Korea, apparently jealous that global attention has shifted elsewhere for the last few weeks, has issued yet another threat against the United States. While this one is just as improbable as all the previous threats that came before it, it's still pretty aggressive.

"If the US imperialists threaten our sovereignty and survival," military chief Hwang Pyong So said at a nationally televised speech, "our troops will fire our nuclear-armed rockets at the White House and the Pentagon — the sources of all evil."

That's right: North Korea threatened, via a military leader, to maybe nuke the White House. No, there is no chance of this happening. Firstly because North Korea lacks anything near the missile technology to move a warhead that far. But, more to point, it's because North Korea makes these threats because outlandish threats are in its interests, not because it actually has any intention of following through.

So why does North Korea make threats like this, and why is it so bellicose and hostile at all? This video explains:

Zack Beauchamp further explained North Korea's issue-scary-but-phony-threats strategy back in June when Pyongyang threatened to "mercilessly destroy" everyone involved with a silly Hollywood comedy that involves Seth Rogen trying to kill North Korean leader Kim Jong Un:

It certainly looks like yet another case of North Korea being crazy and aggressive. But this may actually be a pretty canny bit of public diplomacy by Pyongyang - and one that many Americans, by laughing at "crazy" North Korea, are unwittingly playing right into. According to North Korea expert Jennifer Lind, spewing apparently non-sensical threats at Hollywood funnymen is part of a larger, deliberate strategy to manipulate the West's view of North Korea. The more Americans point and laugh at those crazy North Koreans, the more we help them in that project.

Read more here about why North Korea loves to threaten crazy-sounding attacks it will never carry out.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via