The VA is finally conducting monthly inspections at hospitals and clinics

In response to the Veterans Affairs scandal, the VA announced Wednesday that it will now direct local directors to conduct monthly in-person reviews of scheduling practices in every clinic within their jurisdiction.

"Our top priority is getting veterans off of wait lists and into clinics," acting VA Secretary Sloan Gibson said in a statement. "We need our folks in the facilities to work directly with staff, answer all questions, and ensure our veterans receive the timely care they have earned. Veterans must trust their health-care system, and these reviews are an important step towards restoring integrity in all our scheduling activities."

"Certainly, the way the system is set up, if someone wanted to go in and manipulate it, it would not be hard to do"

The increase in oversight gets to one of the major problems the Government Accountability Office has been pointing to for years: Even if the VA manages to set the right policies without any perverse incentives, the lack of federal oversight at local VA hospitals makes it unlikely that any policies are being properly enforced.

"Certainly, the way the system is set up, if someone wanted to go in and manipulate it, it would not be hard to do," Debra Draper, health-care director at the GAO, said in a previous interview.

At the controversial VA hospital in Phoenix, administrators and schedulers allegedly manipulated and falsified scheduling records to continue receiving pay bonuses for seeing patients in a timely manner, even when patients were waiting on average 115 days for the primary-care appointment. If someone had been watching over the Phoenix VA facility all along, there's a good chance the nefarious scheme could have been prevented or stopped.

Part of the problem, of course, also lies in the perverse incentive created by the VA's wait time goals. Once local VA hospitals realized they couldn't hit the 14-day wait time goal set by federal rules due to rising patient demand and a doctor shortage, many of them resorted to cheating on scheduling records to continue getting their pay bonuses. If the pay bonuses never created an unrealistic goal, the record falsification wouldn't have been incentivized.

One of Gibson's first actions after he replaced former VA Secretary Eric Shinseki was to repeal the 14-day wait time goal. The idea, as emphasized in the VA's own audit, is to do away with the perverse incentive created by the scheduling goal.

Given that both these fixes just required a new VA leader to make regulatory changes, it's questionable that it took a scandal to actually address such serious problems. Many veteran advocates have complained from day one that some of the problems have been known for years, but it took reports of patients dying while waiting for care for serious changes to be made.

Further reading

• Sorry, Mr. President. We've known about the VA's scheduling problems for years.
• Two ways to fix the VA for free — and one that could cost money
• Phoenix VA officials earned $10 million in bonuses while veterans allegedly died waiting for care
• The Senate plan to privatize some veterans' care could cost $500 billion

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via