Border Patrol agents are mocking the child migrant crisis

President Obama has referred to the "surge" of tens of thousands of unaccompanied child migrants into the US as a "humanitarian crisis." But apparently Border Patrol agents are far less sympathetic to the children and teenagers they're apprehending.

This morning, the National Border Patrol Council, the union for US Border Patrol agents, sent out the following tweet:

Border Patrol agents are responsible for screening unaccompanied child migrants after they've been apprehended. Legally, children can spend up to 72 hours in Border Patrol custody; in practice, the current surge of child migrants has strained the system so much that it's possible Border Patrol agents are holding children for longer.

But experts agree that Border Patrol isn't equipped to deal with unaccompanied children, many of whom experienced trauma in their home countries or on the journey.

In fact, there's evidence that Border Patrol agents are abusing the children in their care. A legal complaint filed by the ACLU last week alleges that Border Patrol agents sexually abused a 16-year-old girl by spreading her legs and "touch(ing) her genital area forcefully, making her scream." In another case, the ACLU complaint claims, a 17-year-old was detained with adults in a freezer, where her wet clothes took three and a half days to dry; the only water available to drink in the cell came from the toilet tank.

The Border Patrol union has been dismissive of past allegations of abuse. It appears that they're taking a similar attitude toward these allegations. But in light of the complaint filed this week, referring to custody of unaccompanied child migrants as "babysitting" and "burrito wrapping" seems insensitive at best.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via