AT&T's Pitch to the Feds: Let Us Buy DirecTV, and Maybe TV Bills Won't Go Up So Much

Remember when AT&T told investors that it could cut its programming bills by 20 percent if it buys DirecTV?

That was last week. This week, AT&T is telling regulators why they should let it buy DirecTV, and it’s making a similar argument. One difference: AT&T told investors its own bills would shrink. But it’s not saying that about the bills of its customers.

Instead, AT&T is telling the feds, via a public filing, that combining with DirecTV may help slow the rate that your TV bill goes up. But it can’t promise it will go down.

Instead it uses the words “downward pressure.” As in: “There will be significant downward pressure on the prices of the new integrated bundles of AT&T broadband and DIRECTV video, even without factoring in the improved quality such bundles will offer consumers.”

To be fair, AT&T argues that this pressure will come into effect without factoring in the 20 percent cost savings it told investors about. So it’s always possible that AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson could pass those savings along to his customers. But that’s a promise AT&T isn’t making.

One other note about pricing: AT&T’s summary of its filing also notes that there may be “upward pressure” on the prices of video or broadband services that aren’t bundled together. But it says if that’s the case it will be “significantly outweighed by the downward pressure [AT&T’s emphasis] on the prices of bundles of AT&T broadband and DIRECTV video that will now be available at improved quality and attractive prices.”

I’ve asked AT&T for clarification, but to me that reads as if the company is looking into the future and predicting a scenario where broadband prices for cord-cutters go up a lot faster than broadband prices for people who also buy pay TV from AT&T. And that AT&T is saying that’s no big deal, because people should just buy broadband and pay TV from AT&T, and stop worrying about it.

Which may very well be what the future holds. I’m just not sure I would say that out loud if I were Randall Stephenson.

Update: One alternate interpretation of AT&T’s upward/downward language — AT&T is trying to say that it will have incentive to sell standalone broadband at competitive prices, so that it could eventually upsell those customers into bundles that include video. But if that’s what they mean, it would be easier to just say that out loud.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via