Remember the Last Time Beats Sold Itself to a Phone Maker?

If Apple does indeed complete a deal to acquire Beats Electronics, it won’t be the first phone maker to have taken control of the venture.

It still has the opportunity, though, to be the first company to do so successfully.

Back in August 2011, Taiwan’s HTC paid $300 million to acquire a majority stake in Beats.

“With the magic of mobile devices, it is easier than ever to discover and buy new music,” HTC CEO Peter Chou said in an interview at the time. “However, without great sound experience, it is a shame.”

Beats CEO Jimmy Iovine, meanwhile, made the case that digital products had become the main vehicles for listening to music, yet sound quality had waned.

“We went to digital and got worse,” he said at the time of the HTC deal. “That’s unacceptable. What has to happen is anyone who makes consumer electronics that transmit music has to be encouraged — to put it mildly — to have great audio.”

Enthusiasm on both sides, though, quickly waned. Although HTC included Beats Audio on several phones, little positive came of the partnership.

In 2012, HTC pared back its stake to 25 percent, before selling its remaining stake in 2013. In all, HTC got $415 million back on its $300 million investment.

Beats, of course, has changed quite a bit. While it bought streaming music service Mog back in the days of HTC, it has since become a much bigger player in that market with the launch of Beats Music.

HTC and Beats had paid lip service to continuing to work together even after HTC sold its stake, but the two have gone their separate ways. In a sign of just how far the Beats-HTC partnership has frayed, HTC recently announced a souped-up audio version of its latest One phone — in partnership with Beats rival Harman Kardon.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via