Medicare's ban on sex-reassignment surgeries is over

Medicare can no longer ban sex-reassignment surgeries, an independent board ruled Friday.

The ruling, in short, declared Medicare's ban scientifically outdated. When Medicare first imposed the ban in the 1980s, it reasoned, like many other health experts at the time, that transgender status was an untreatable mental health condition. Today, most of the health-care community, including the American Psychiatric Association, considers that view outdated: gender dysphoria can, depending on the patient, be successfully treated with hormone therapy and sex-reassignment surgery.

The board's decision does not require Medicare to cover sex-reassignment surgeries

The board's decision, however, does not require Medicare to cover sex-reassignment surgeries, nor does it affect other government-run programs like Medicaid. It instead allows regional Medicare agencies and contractors to provide the procedure at their choosing.

LGBT advocates, prior to the decision, were fairly confident the board would rule in their favor. Advocates also suggested that the decision could influence private insurers and even Medicaid, since private insurers sometimes base their coverage decisions on the federal government's standards.

"Today's decision is a spectacular development," Amy Nelson, supervising attorney at Whitman-Walker Health's Legal Services Program, said in a statement. "Transgender and gender-variant people continue to face many barriers in seeking health services. Insurance coverage decisions should be consistent with science, and for far too long, that has not been the case. We hope this decision leads to the continued normalization of transgender health needs among insurers and medical providers."

Private health insurers, in response to questions about the looming decision, said that they base their coverage decisions on clinical evidence of safety and effectiveness of particular treatments for specific populations. Some private insurers already provided coverage for sex-reassignment surgeries, but not all.

The decision came through the Departmental Appeals Board, a board of experts that evaluates Medicare policies with a focus on science. The board is supposed to act independent of the US Department of Health and Human Services — and hopefully politics — when it issues decisions.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via