The best evidence yet Obamacare competition lowers premiums

The White House has long argued that, under Obamacare, competition in the exchanges will lower health premiums. When insurers have to compete side-by-side, the thinking goes, they'll have a new incentive to compete with other health plans on price.

A new paper is arguably the best evidence yet that this might be true.

A trio of health economists shows that a major health insurer's decision to sit out healthcare.gov, only competing in the state-run marketplaces, led to 5.4 percent higher premiums on the federal site.

It's easy to show that exchanges with more competitors have lower premiums, as economists Leemore Dafny, Jonathan Gruber and Christopher Oby chart in this new working paper.

This tells us that markets with more insurers tend to have lower premiums, but doesn't suggest a causal relationship.  There are dozens of the things at play when insurers set prices like how sick the local population is, and how much local hospitals charge for visits.

So Dafny, Gruber and Oby looked at one particular factor that could measure the effect of competition. They homed in on UnitedHealthcare's decision not to sell any plans on healthcare.gov this year, deciding instead to only sell products on the state-marketplaces.

United dropped lots of hints about this approach in late 2013 and early 2014, giving its competitors a pretty decent heads up on where it would, and would not, be selling.  This gives a window to compare how insurers priced in the markets where United decided to compete, and where it didn't.

The new working paper estimates that premiums for the benchmark plan* on healthcare.gov would have been 5.4 percent lower if United had sold on that federal marketplace. And if all major insurers had jumped into the pool, premiums would have cost 11.1 percent less.

This matters a lot for shoppers, and the federal government. Obamacare commits the feds to paying a certain percent of low and middle income shoppers' health insurance premiums. If the overall tap is lower, that puts the government on the hook for a smaller share.

United has already indicated plans to expand into other markets next year, which could be good news for insurance premiums in 2015.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via