# A group needs just 23 people in it for 2 of them to probably share a birthday

Libby Nelson is Vox's policy editor, leading coverage of how government action and inaction shape American life. Libby has more than a decade of policy journalism experience, including at Inside Higher Ed and Politico. She joined Vox in 2014.

So you've got a cocktail party full of people, or a classroom full of students, or a relatively small office. What's the likelihood that two people will share a birthday, leading to two rounds of cupcakes or two rounds of drinks in the same day?

It's bigger than you might think. If there are at least 23 people in the room, it's more likely than not that two of them were born on the same date. That seems counterintuitive; there are way more than 23 possible birthdays in a year. But it's a well-trod area of probability theory known as the "birthday problem."

The way to make sense of it is to think about it backwards: How likely is it that, with 23 people in a room, none of them shares a birthday? There are 253 possible ways to pair up everyone in the room, and thus 253 possible birthdate combinations. (Here's the math behind that.)

As NPR's Math Guy, Stanford professor Keith Devlin, explained in 2005:

With just two people, the probability that they have different birthdays is 364/365, or about .997. If a third person joins them, the probability that this new person has a different birthday from those two (i.e., the probability that all three will have different birthdays) is (364/365) x (363/365), about .992. With a fourth person, the probability that all four have different birthdays is (364/365) x (363/365) x (362/365), which comes out at around .983. And so on. The answers to these multiplications get steadily smaller. When a twenty-third person enters the room, the final fraction that you multiply by is 343/365, and the answer you get drops below .5 for the first time

Try it for yourself here. Here's a longer example from Khan Academy, using a room of 30:

I started to wonder about this two years ago, in the first couple of months after Vox launched. At the time, we just had 23 full-time editorial employees. And in May 2014, we had two sets of shared birthdays: one on May 9, and one on my birthday, May 18. (Happy birthday to me, and to Matt Yglesias!)

The first shared birthday seemed like an intriguing oddity: After all, we weren't a very big group. (We've since grown a lot — enough to have more than two sets of shared birthdays.) But sharing my own birthday seemed like a much more amazing and unlikely coincidence.

There are statistics to back up that self-centered reaction. It's almost even odds if you're in a group of 23 people that two people will share a birthday, but it's much less likely — about 6 percent — that one of those two people will be you.

### Some birthdays are more common than others

The most unlikely thing about our shared birthday, it turns out, is that it's in May.

The birthday problem probability math assumes that birthdays are spread perfectly evenly throughout the year. And anyone with a Facebook account knows that's not the case.

The New York Times published data from Harvard professor Amitabh Chandra on the most popular birthdays in the U.S. Between 1973 and 1999, the most common birthday was Sept. 16; the least common (except Feb. 29) was Christmas. Here it is in a heat map from Facebook's Andy Kriebel:

September babies are really, really common. (Nine months after the holidays.) In fact, they take up the top 10 most common birthdays. July birthdays come in a close second.

May 18  — my birthday, and Matt's — was the 188th most popular, just missing the top half. So it's more unusual to have two Vox birthdays on  May 18 than Sept. 16. But two Dec. 25 birthdays would be really incredible.