Skip to main content

With 10 days left, we need your help

The US presidential campaign is in its final weeks and we’re dedicated to helping you understand the stakes. In this election cycle, it’s more important than ever to provide context beyond the headlines. But in-depth reporting is costly, so to continue this vital work, we have an ambitious goal to add 5,000 new members.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Support Vox

Should paying for rape kits mean less money for victim services?

This forensic doctor in Texas might be getting paid out of victim compensation funds.
This forensic doctor in Texas might be getting paid out of victim compensation funds.
This forensic doctor in Texas might be getting paid out of victim compensation funds.
Max Faulkner/Fort Worth Star-Telegram/Getty

According to a new study from the Urban Institute, most states are taking money away from victim support services in order to provide free medical forensic exams (often called “rape kits”) to sexual-assault victims.

States are required to pay out-of-pocket costs for victims’ forensic exams in order to qualify for certain federal funds to fight violence against women. And the federal government is serious about this requirement: when some states started requiring victims to report their assaults to police before they’d be reimbursed for their rape kits, the federal government tweaked the law in 2005 to require states to cover the costs of all victims, whether they ended up reporting an assault to police or not.

Thirty-four states decided to pay for rape kits through their victim compensation funds: funds set up in every state to reimburse victims of crimes (of all types) for lost wages, medical and mental health care, and funeral costs. Some of these states only use the victim compensation fund to pay for rape kits in some cases (for example, if the victim doesn’t report the crime to police); nineteen states bill victim compensation funds for every exam they conduct.

Rape kits can eat up a large portion of the victim compensation fund’s budget. In Indiana, 78% of the state’s compensation fund went to rape exams in 2013 — no other state comes close to that, but several states do spend over 20%.

Screen_shot_2014-05-14_at_2.52.10_pm

States can argue that providing free medical exams counts as a service to victims — especially when those victims don’t end up reporting the crime to police. But they haven’t always allocated more money to victim compensation funds to cover the costs. The federal government is supposed to reimburse states for 60% of what victim funds spend on services, but over the past few years it’s been more like 20%. And the new federal requirements for states to pay for rape kits went into effect just as states got hit with a recession that led to more requests for victim services, and state budgetary crises that meant states had less money to give.

Several state officials told the Urban Institute that with all of these factors, there just isn’t room in their victim fund’s budget to cover the additional cost of rape kits without cutting something else. That means, the Urban Institute report concludes, that victim funds are being forced to choose between providing rape kits and providing other forms of support to victims. And since rape kits are federally mandated, other forms of support are inevitably getting cut.

The entire Texas government is fighting over whether to save a man’s lifeThe entire Texas government is fighting over whether to save a man’s life
Criminal Justice

Robert Roberson was sentenced to die on a theory that’s now widely viewed with skepticism by medical experts.

By Ian Millhiser
The strange case that the Supreme Court keeps refusing to decideThe strange case that the Supreme Court keeps refusing to decide
Supreme Court

A mysterious Supreme Court case could change everything about criminal punishment.

By Ian Millhiser
These Floridians couldn’t flee Hurricane Milton. They’re incarcerated.These Floridians couldn’t flee Hurricane Milton. They’re incarcerated.
Climate

Multiple Florida jails opted not to evacuate despite being in the storm’s direct trajectory.

By Li Zhou
Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett seem unsure whether to save a man’s lifeBrett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett seem unsure whether to save a man’s life
Supreme Court

It’s unclear how the Supreme Court will resolve an unusually messy death penalty case.

By Ian Millhiser
The Supreme Court appears to have found a gun regulation it actually likesThe Supreme Court appears to have found a gun regulation it actually likes
Supreme Court

The justices appear skeptical of “ghost guns.”

By Ian Millhiser
The Supreme Court will decide if Oklahoma must execute a man it doesn’t want to killThe Supreme Court will decide if Oklahoma must execute a man it doesn’t want to kill
Supreme Court

The state’s Republican attorney general took the rare step of asking the Supreme Court to set aside Richard Glossip’s capital conviction.

By Ian Millhiser