FCC chairman denies he's killing network neutrality

Tom Wheeler, President Obama's choice to lead the Federal Communications Commission, is disputing charges that his latest open internet regulations will gut network neutrality. According to the New York Times, Wheeler will give a speech at the National Cable and Telecommunications Association convention today telling net neutrality opponents to "put away the party hats."

"The open internet rules will be tough, enforceable, and, with the concurrence of my colleagues, in place with dispatch," Wheeler insists.

Wheeler told net neutrality opponents to "put away the party hats"

In January, the DC Circuit Appeals Court struck down network neutrality rules that Wheeler's predecessor had crafted in 2010. The court ruling limited Wheeler's options, because it meant that only weak network neutrality regulations were guaranteed to be accepted by the courts. Those rules allow broadband ISPs to discriminate, but only if doing so was "commercially reasonable." That phrase hasn't been clearly defined by the courts, but liberals fear that in practice it will be a green light for ISPs to violate network neutrality.

Some network neutrality supporters have urged Wheeler to take the bolder step of declaring broadband a "telecommunications service," a legal category that gives the FCC broader regulatory authority. But that step would be controversial, and it could lead to more years of litigation. Wheeler decided it was better to get weak network neutrality rules in place quickly than to risk years of further uncertainty in pursuit of stronger rules.

But Wheeler says he will use stronger medicine if necessary. "If someone acts to divide the Internet between haves and have-nots, we will use every power at our disposal to stop it," Wheeler says. That includes re-classifying broadband as a telecommunication service, a procedure known to telecom insiders as "Title II."

.@TomWheelerFCC: "I will not hesitate to use Title II if warranted." #cable2014

— Gigi Sohn (@GigiBSohnFCC) April 30, 2014

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via