Capital in the 21st Century is the bestselling book on Amazon

Thomas Piketty's Capital in the 21st Century, in its hardcover edition, is currently the #1 best-selling book on Amazon. Perhaps a bit tellingly, the Kindle edition is only the #23 book in the Kindle store. That indicates to me that demand for a handsome volume of a widely discussed book to sit on your shelf is perhaps a bit higher than demand for actually reading the book. So if you've bought the book to sit on your shelf and want to be able to discuss it intelligently without reading it, I would suggest our short guide.

Meanwhile, Piketty's best-seller status — though well-deserved — also highlights one of the drivers of contemporary economic inequality. Superstar effects.

People like to buy great books and listen to great songs and watch great movies and TV shows. But people also like to be part of the "in crowd" and "the conversation." So when certain things reach a certain level of popularity, other people check them out precisely because everyone is talking about them. That means that being the book on economic inequality is much more lucrative than being the fourth-best book on economic inequality.

These kind of disproportionate rewards for superstars have probably always been with us. But as the number of people who could conceivably buy a book grows — because of a mix of population growth and economic progress in poor countries — the returns to being the superstar grow disproportionately fast and inequality rises.

Conservatives often point to these kind of superstar effects as an example of a benign reason for inequality to increase. After all, Piketty hasn't done anything underhanded to earn his bestseller status. The other way of looking at it, however, is that these superstar effects compound other problems with overly strong copyright protections. In a world of strong superstar effects we should be liberalizing intellectual property rules. Instead, the United States government — under the influence of Hollywood and others — is using trade policy to try to make them ever-stronger.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via