Massachusetts and Texas have one thing in common — cost-effective government

Politicians like to argue about taxes, but arguably the more important issue is what does a government spend on. High taxes to pay for excellent services makes a lot of sense. Medium taxes to pay for terrible services makes very little sense. So kudos to WalletHub for trying to create a dataset that compares state tax levels to measures of public service quality.

The way they did it ends up producing some results that tend to cut across partisan lines. For example, by this measure Texas taxpayers are getting an excellent return on investment for their (relatively small) tax burden. But so are taxpayers in high-tax Massachusetts. By contrast, California looks bad. And Arkansas looks really bad.

Which is to say that you can make liberalism work well and you can also make conservatism work well. But you can also make either general approach work poorly.

We're here to shed some clarity

One of our core beliefs here at Vox is that everyone needs and deserves access to the information that helps them understand the world, regardless of whether they can pay for a subscription. With the 2024 election on the horizon, more people are turning to us for clear and balanced explanations of the issues and policies at stake. We’re so grateful that we’re on track to hit 85,000 contributions to the Vox Contributions program before the end of the year, which in turn helps us keep this work free. We need to add 2,500 contributions this month to hit that goal. Will you make a contribution today to help us hit this goal and support our policy coverage? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via