Twitter Needs to Fix Its Growth Problem

Twitter says it’s the global town square. For that to be true, it needs a whole lot more people inside of it.

The company reported earnings as a public company for the first time on Tuesday. And while the ad business looks to be humming along fine, the numbers underscored an ongoing issue: They need to add more users. Twitter only signed up nine million more people in the last three months of 2013.

Twitter shares dropped more than 20 percent this morning on these concerns.

As we’ve said for a while, this is a big deal for the company. CEO Dick Costolo’s goal is to “reach every person on the planet,” not to be a niche service. The company has already set the stakes for itself, and they’re sky high.

Twitter does have a fast-growing ad business going for it thus far. While revenue was virtually nothing in 2011 and 2012, Twitter expects to do a billion-dollar 2014. That proves that Twitter isn’t just selling ads — it’s selling them fast.

Herein lies the problem: Twitter’s entire pitch to marketers is that it’s a new type of advertising that really connects with the mainstream. Real-time, relevant promoted tweets, delivered right when a consumer needs to see them the most, the spiel goes, make for the most effective sort of ad.

The issue with that is this: Advertisers are buying space based on the pitch that this is a mainstream product, and that those ads will reach the masses. And at 241 million worldwide active users, Twitter has hardly gone mainstream. Facebook, by contrast, serves about 1.2 billion users.

It’s the same deal with Twitter’s social TV pitch. Twitter says it’s the second-screen soundtrack, the place where users chatter about what they’re watching, and where brands need to be to connect with their audience. But as the numbers note, that audience isn’t as big as Twitter wants it to be.

Can Twitter make the product more accessible to normal people? Costolo says it can, via an “experimental” testing framework for rolling out new products. In other words, a data-driven Twitter will tweak things to figure out what people like the most.

For now, as my colleague Peter Kafka has said, advertisers are fine with toeing the waters in social. Advertisers will drop some marginal amount of experimental dollars on social ad spending. But if Twitter doesn’t fix its user growth problem fast, marketers may start to take their money elsewhere. (My guess? To Facebook, which actually is a mainstream service.)

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple of big issues with relying on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on:

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. And we can’t do that if we have a paywall.

So even though advertising is still our biggest source of revenue, we also seek grants and reader support. (And no matter how our work is funded, we have strict guidelines on editorial independence.)

If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today? Any amount helps.

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via