Ballot selfies are illegal, for no very good reason

As millions of Americans voted Tuesday night, many talked about it on social media using the #IVoted hashtag, frequently with photos. At times, these voting selfies included images of the ballot — which seems like a natural way to brag.

The only problem is that, according to the Digital Media Law Project, this is illegal in most states. Laws prohibiting recordings of any kind inside a polling place are somewhat common, and specific directives against photographing one's own marked ballot even more so.

The rationale is that this is supposed to prevent illegal vote buying.

After all, the theory goes, if you're going to pay me $50 to cast a vote for your favorite candidate, then you're going to want some proof that I actually did it. A photo of a marked ballot would be ideal proof. Ban photos, and you make proof impossible. With proof impossible, there will be no vote-selling. And with no vote selling, political equality will reign supreme, even as disparities in wealth and income exist elsewhere in society.

But is it constitutional to prevent people from communicating information about their own voting behavior? The American Civil Liberties Union says no and is suing New Hampshire to try to free the ballot selfie.

Since a would-be vote-seller could sit down with a vote-buyer and an absentee ballot in most states, it seems exceptionally unlikely that legalization would spur a massive wave of fraud. And it's hardly as if the wealthy are currently lacking means to exercise disproportionate influence over the political process.

The current Supreme Court's free speech jurisprudence has unleashed plenty of money in politics and held that essentially all efforts to restrain the rich from turning money into campaign spending violate the constitution. Under the circumstances, letting everyday folks have a little free speech with their smartphones seems like a no brainer.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via