Twitter Users Laugh at Twitter, but Wall Street Makes a Real Statement

Wait a minute: You’re saying that Twitter, a company that employs many smart people, spent a day straining to impress Wall Street — and then blew the whole thing with a terribly written mission statement?

Yup!

Also: Nope!

To catch you up, if you didn’t spend yesterday on Twitter*: On Wednesday, Twitter hosted a day-long show for investors, which generated a flurry of data points about the company’s size and ambition.

But at the end of the day, a certain kind of Twitterer focused on one particular slide that popped up during CFO Anthony Noto’s presentation, which contained a “strategy statement.”

To be fair, it was a doozy of a strategy statement:

“That’s a mouthful. I struggle reading it every time,” Noto said, after struggling to read it.

Then, after the Wall Street Journal highlighted the clunker of a sentence in a story, the paper’s Dennis Berman went to town, identifying it as a “mission statement” while cataloging its many flaws in a single tweet:

https://twitter.com/dkberman/status/532667708622774272

And then — because Twitter is pretty much designed to work this way — Twitter’s “mission statement” went viral. Conclusion: Twitter is broken because Twitter’s mission statement is broken.

https://twitter.com/mattbuchanan/status/532673111922343936

https://twitter.com/fmanjoo/status/532673457906274304

https://twitter.com/christiannaths/status/532773601087197184

https://twitter.com/sama/status/532717979201323008

And it’s still going.

But! Twitter is wrong, says Twitter: Twitter’s actual mission statement existed before investor day, and it remains unchanged:

https://twitter.com/dickc/status/532729891553558528

For the record, this is the real deal. Note the absence of ugly words like “platform” and “revenue”: “To give everyone the power to create and share ideas and information instantly, without barriers.”

See? You can’t believe everything you read on Twitter! Maybe especially when it’s about Twitter?

The good news, for Twitter, is that Wall Street doesn’t care what Twitter users say. But it does care what Twitter executives say: Investors pushed the stock up more than seven percent — a couple billion dollars worth of market cap — by the end of the day.

True story.

* Or if you have and you’re more interested in other things.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via