The iPhone 5c Comes in Green, Yellow, Blue, Red, White and Disappointing

It has been clear for a while now that the colorful iPhone 5c hasn’t been the hit that Apple was hoping for.

That point was put in black and white throughout Apple’s quarterly earnings report on Monday.

It was clear as the company reported iPhone sales of 51 million units — a record, but not the 54 million or more figure that some analysts were expecting.

The iPhone 5c disappointment was most clear in North America, where Apple’s sales actually dropped from a year ago even as they rose steadily in most of the rest of the world.

“In North America we did not do as well,” CEO Tim Cook said during a conference call with analysts.

Part of the problem, Cook said, was the fact that when the company forecasted demand for the holiday quarter, it expected the 5c to make up considerably more of its sales than the product did, resulting in a shortage of the higher-end iPhone 5s that customers preferred. The company spent the rest of the quarter trying to adjust for demand, Cook said.

Of course, there are plenty of positives for Apple if customers go for a high-end model over a midrange one. It means more sales dollars, and puts a greater number of customers on the latest technology, most notably the fingerprint-sensing Touch ID system (which Cook acknowledged could make for a nice payment system).

The longer-term question, though, is how well Apple can compete at the lower end. Analysts did their usual job pressing Apple for details on whether it might go differently or more aggressively beyond the high end of the smartphone market. Cook didn’t rule anything out or in when it comes to pricing.

“Our line in the sand is making something that’s not fantastic,” he said.

And speaking of fantastic things, Cook promised lots of them for 2014, though without any specifics. The most Cook and other Apple executives would say is that Apple’s new products this year would come both in areas where the company has products today and some new areas where it doesn’t.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via