Netflix Says It Will Be Fine Without Net Neutrality Rules

Last week a court decision struck down — for now — a federal agency’s attempt to enforce “net neutrality.” That move raised the possibility that Netflix, which is already fighting with broadband providers about the quality and cost of their service, could get stuck paying more to deliver its video over the Web. And Netflix stock dropped in the aftermath.

No worries, says Netflix CEO Reed Hastings.

Netflix had not made any comments about the ruling until today, but Hastings addressed it in his quarterly earnings letter to shareholders. The short version: Even if net neutrality isn’t reinstated, Hastings says, cable and telco broadband providers won’t choke the company out, because their customers would freak out.

That said, Hastings, who spent part of last spring calling out Comcast* for what he said were violations of net neutrality, says he sure would like some federal oversight. Just in case.

Here’s the long version:

“Unfortunately, Verizon successfully challenged the U.S. net neutrality rules. In principle, a domestic ISP now can legally impede the video streams that members request from Netflix, degrading the experience we jointly provide. The motivation could be to get Netflix to pay fees to stop this degradation. Were this draconian scenario to unfold with some ISP, we would vigorously protest and encourage our members to demand the open Internet they are paying their ISP to deliver.

The most likely case, however, is that ISPs will avoid this consumer-unfriendly path of discrimination. ISPs are generally aware of the broad public support for net neutrality and don’t want to galvanize government action.

Moreover, ISPs have very profitable broadband businesses they want to expand. Consumers purchase higher bandwidth packages mostly for one reason: high-quality streaming video. ISPs appear to recognize this and many of them are working closely with us and other streaming video services to enable the ISPs subscribers to more consistently get the high-quality streaming video consumers desire.

In the long-term, we think Netflix and consumers are best served by strong network neutrality across all networks, including wireless. To the degree that ISPs adhere to a meaningful voluntary code of conduct, less regulation is warranted. To the degree that some aggressive ISPs start impeding specific data flows, more regulation would clearly be needed.”

Meanwhile, investors seem just fine with the legal status quo. Following an earnings report that beat expectations, Netflix stock is trading above $388 — up more than 20 percent from where it was last week after the court ruling.

*Comcast owns NBCUniversal, which has invested in the company that owns this website.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what we’re trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, we’re not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world — not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe that’s an important part of building a more equal society. We can’t do that if we have a paywall.

That’s why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

One-Time Monthly Annual

$5/month

$10/month

$25/month

$50/month

Other

$

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via