How McCutcheon v. FEC will change American politics

9 Cards

CURATED BY Andrew Prokop

2014-04-11 16:12:01 -0400

  1. What is the McCutcheon v. FEC ruling?
  2. Can billionaires now give unlimited contributions to candidates?
  3. Chief Justice Roberts doesn't believe big money in politics leads to corruption?
  4. Why did four justices dissent from the ruling?
  5. What does the McCutcheon v. FEC ruling mean for election spending?
  6. How will the ruling change American politics?
  7. Which campaign finance laws hasn’t the Supreme Court struck down yet?
  8. Which donors are most likely to take advantage of the ruling?
  9. Are US campaign finance laws now way looser than other countries?
  1. Card 1 of 9

    What is the McCutcheon v. FEC ruling?

    On April 2, 2014, the Supreme Court announced its ruling in the McCutcheon v. FEC case, the latest in a series of contentious decisions striking down limits on campaign finance.

    At issue in McCutcheon was a law capping overall combined giving to federal candidates — no individual was permitted to give more than $48,600 in any one election cycle. (Individuals are allowed to spend much greater sums independently, but not to hand it over to the candidates themselves.) There is also a cap of $74,600 each year on contributions to all federal PACs and party committees.The justices' 5-4 ruling said that these caps were unconstitutional.

    In the case, businessman Shaun McCutcheon argued that the cap violated his right to freedom of speech. McCutcheon gave money to several Congressional candidates during the 2012 elections, and he wanted to give to several more — but he was limited by that $48,600 cap.

    In past rulings on campaign finance, the Supreme Court has held that spending money on elections is an exercise of free speech, and therefore protected by the First Amendment. The court has attempted to balance this right against concerns about the possibility of corruption or "its appearance." In McCutcheon, the court found that "the Government may no more restrict how many candidates or causes a donor may support than it may tell a newspaper how many candidates it may endorse."

  2. Card 2 of 9

    Can billionaires now give unlimited contributions to candidates?

  3. Card 3 of 9

    Chief Justice Roberts doesn't believe big money in politics leads to corruption?

  4. Card 4 of 9

    Why did four justices dissent from the ruling?

  5. Card 5 of 9

    What does the McCutcheon v. FEC ruling mean for election spending?

  6. Card 6 of 9

    How will the ruling change American politics?

  7. Card 7 of 9

    Which campaign finance laws hasn’t the Supreme Court struck down yet?

  8. Card 8 of 9

    Which donors are most likely to take advantage of the ruling?

  9. Card 9 of 9

    Are US campaign finance laws now way looser than other countries?

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.
Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.